More Pages: Grand Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67


Not for the average man!
Very complete for the home mechanic

Had that re-reading from 7 years agoMitchell Morse who had once been a good linebacker in college, but chose a career as a police officer, eventually lost that job due to his excessive force. Then as a security guard . . . which he eventually lost . . . ended up as a guard at a discount store, where he was to meet Starla who worked as a cashier.
Starla, whom was very loose with herself in an attempt to get out of a dreadful job, and dreadful city, encountered more grief when an ex-husband whom she had self-proclaimed being divorced from eight years ago came knocking at her trailer. She didn't like being around Meat, but his idea to get a lot of money held her interest. Though it would be a long two months before the robbery, having to put up with Meat and that goof Ducky in the meantime.
Doc Kasperson (a scammer of sorts . . . teetering legitimacy with his hair growth idea) was an acquaintance of Meat, and who was brought in to get the details of the job. Unfortunately throughout the novel there is a client who constantly is pestering the Doc, along with the story, but becomes relevant towards the end.
This novel contains an occasional interlude of dark humor that may or may not pertain to the story, but when it involves Meat and Ducky these humor parts make the story worth reading. It's well written, but overdone and could have been shortened by 40 pages.
indentation........So, now that this has been re-read: The ex-cons were "Meat" and "Ducky," the huge and scrawny, respectively. Starla is the wife of Meat, whom she hadn't seen in eight years, and is forced into helping with robbing an armored truck at the department store she works at.
Starla looks for help in the plan (and for her own sake) by getting "Morse" included. And Morse, who has gone from college linebacker, to police officer, to security gaurd, to then hit bottom at the department store looking for thieves, goes along, but not for the sake of Starla or the money; he want's to break up the robbery.
There's Doc Kasperson involved, too; who mixes upgrading the plan of the robbery with scamming men over hair products. This charactor, and the man he is scamming, might be a bit of an annoyance, and interfering with the interesting and comical escapades of Meat and Ducky, who are without a doubt the main attraction.
This crime novel is well written, but to me, about a total of 20 pages here and there too long, maybe more. Ranking Tom Kakonis's novels: 1. Double Down / 2. Michigan Roll / 3. Shadow Counter / 4. Criss Cross


Very bad book
An excellent Ferrari book

GM Auto Repair Manual (1986-1995 Buick, Olds., Pontiac)
GM Repair made easy.

an okay book
A departure less exotic than simply odd

A mixed-bag.He second guesses US designer's analysis of British ships (like I always say, 20-20 hindsight is a wonderful thing) but then admits that these were probably for ships for which he (Brown) lacks references for. He then puts up future DNC Goodall's contemporary analysis of US designs without noting the errors contained in them that have been exposed for literally decades (see Friedman's "US Battleships" for one).
Mr. Brown also raises the old bug-a-boo about the all-or-nothing protection scheme of the "Standards" as being possibly overwhelmed by numerous hits on their unprotected ends. Somehow, he seems to be forgetting the fact that every post-war British capital ship design used nearly the same scheme, to say nothing that such fears were shown groundless by the pummeling that the USS Colorado received during WWII. If the all-or-nothing protection scheme was so bad, why then was it copied in most of its essentials in British post-WWI capital ship designs? Why didn't the Nelson's, KGV's, Lion's and Vanguard continue to use the incremental armor scheme so favored in the pre-war dreadnoughts? Perhaps Mr. Brown is saving such thoughts for the next volume in this series, but it's a glaring omission, nonetheless.
But, my very favorite passage was where Mr. Brown discusses the wartime exploits of British battlecruisers. In what can only be called revisionist history, Mr. Brown states that "the author believes that the basic concept of the battlecruiser was sound. Invincible's glorious career at Heligoland Bight, Falklands and Jutland justifies that statement. The three magazine explosions at Jutland (and the later case of Hood) have obscured the real value of such ships."
Sorry, but that just reminds this reader of that famous U.S. saying, "Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how did you enjoy the play?" The exploits of a single ship, no matter how glorious, can not be said to justify a ship type that is most remembered for "sinking and leaving barely enough survivors to man a Yugo," to use a phrase I wish I'd thought of first (my hat's off to Cen). I'm afraid that the author's admiration for these ships' undeniably powerful appearance has kept him from applying his considerable talent for design analysis to their equally obvious flaws.
That said, this book does offer very interesting insights into the ships of all classes being built in Britain in the 1906-22 time frame. If you stick to following what the author knows best, the British design process, you won't go far wrong. His examples of British naval design thinking are mostly original, and include details for the lessor known ships, such as destroyers and submarines, that are so hard to find for pre-WWI vessels.
Finally, he cleared up something that has always puzzled me; why the British were so reluctant to fit super-firing turrets on their warships. For that alone, this book was a worthy addition to my library.
The Grand Fleet

Completely DispensableTo aid readers, in this review I've listed the works in this collection, with notes indicating other collections they have appeared in. Where a work has appeared under more than one title, I give both titles separated by a slash.
Table of Contents:
"Miracles" (1), (2)
"Dogma and the Universe" / "Dogma and the Universe" & "Dogma and Science" (1), (2)
"Answers to Questions on Christianity" (1), (2), (3)
"Myth Became Fact" (1), (2)
"'Horrid Red Things'" (1), (2), (4), (5)
"Religion and Science" (1), (2)
"The Laws of Nature" (1), (2)
"The Grand Miracle" (1), (2)
"Christian Apologetics" (1), (2), (3), (5)
"Work and Prayer" (1), (2)
"Man or Rabbit?" (1), (2)
"Religion Without Dogma?" / "A Christian Reply to Professor Price" (1), (2), (3), (5)
"Some Thoughts" (1), (2), (4), (5)
"'The Trouble With "X" ...'" (1), (2)
"What are We to Make of Jesus Christ?" (1), (2)
"Dangers of National Repentance" (1), (2), (6)
"Two Ways With the Self" (1), (2), (6)
"On the Reading of Old Books" (1), (2), (4)
"Scraps" (1), (2), (6)
"The Decline of Religion" (1), (2), (4), (5)
"Vivisection" (1), (2), (4), (5)
"Modern Translations of the Bible" (1), (2), (4), (5)
"God in the Dock" / "Difficulties in Presenting the Christian Faith to Unbelievers" (1), (2)
"Cross-Examination" / "I was Decided Upon" & "Heaven, Earth and Outer Space" (1), (2), (6)
"The Sermon and the Lunch" (1), (2), (4)
"What Christmas Means to Me" (1), (2), (6)
Notes:
(1) also published in "God in the Dock - Essays on Theology and Ethics" / "Undeceptions - Essays on Theology and Ethics"
(2) also published in "Essay Collection & Other Short Pieces"
(3) also published in "Timeless at Heart: Essays on Theology"
(4) also published in "First and Second Things: Essays on Theology and Ethics"
(6) also published in "Christian Reunion and Other Essays"
Recommendations:
This is an unnecessary collection. Everything in it is already available in "God in the Dock - Essays on Theology and Ethics", it will overlap almost any other collection of Lewis' shorter writings on Christianity you might buy, and will give you no work you cannot get elsewhere. Don't buy it.
So what should you get?
If you are interested in Lewis's shorter works, my best advice is to get "Essay Collection & Other Short Pieces", which, as of the time of this writing, is available from .... That collection consists of about 130 short works by Lewis. The works in that collection are mostly, but not exclusively, Christian.
If your interest in Lewis's shorter works is restricted to those on Christianity, and your budget or enthusiasm does not run to "Essay Collection & Other Short Pieces", then my second-best advice is to get any or all of the following (they don't overlap significantly, and between them they include most of Lewis's shorter Christian writings):
"God in the Dock - Essays on Theology and Ethics"*
"The World's Last Night and Other Essays"
"Christian Reflections"
"The Weight of Glory and Other Addresses"
* Be careful - there is a UK Fontana paperback lurking about called "God in the Dock - Essays on Theology" that is substantially shorter than the "God in the Dock - Essays on Theology and Ethics" collection. A full version of "God in the Dock - Essays on Theology and Ethics" was published in the UK under the title "Undeceptions - Essays on Theology and Ethics".
For those who thought "god," not "God"

There are better books
Take it to the Grand Canyon with you

A Bad Book
OK, but not worth the money

Expected more